幼儿科学教育对于培养科学素养至关重要，然而，将复杂的科学概念转化为适合幼儿年龄的内容对教育者来说仍然充满挑战。本研究评估了四种领先的大型语言模型（LLMs）——GPT-4、Claude、Gemini 和 Llama，在生物学、化学和物理学领域生成适合学龄前儿童的科学解释的能力。通过30名幼儿园教师使用已确立的教学标准进行系统的评估，我们发现这些模型在创建引人入胜、准确且适合发展的内容方面存在显著差异。出乎意料的是，Claude在生物主题上的表现优于其他模型，而所有LLMs在抽象化学概念方面都遇到了困难。我们的研究结果为利用AI进行早期科学教育的教育者提供了实用见解，并为开发人员提升LLMs的教育应用提供了指导。结果强调了使用LLMs弥合早期儿童科学素养差距的潜力及其当前局限性。

Early childhood science education is crucial for developing scientific literacy, yet translating complex scientific concepts into age-appropriate content remains challenging for educators. Our study evaluates four leading Large Language Models (LLMs) - GPT-4, Claude, Gemini, and Llama - on their ability to generate preschool-appropriate scientific explanations across biology, chemistry, and physics. Through systematic evaluation by 30 nursery teachers using established pedagogical criteria, we identify significant differences in the models' capabilities to create engaging, accurate, and developmentally appropriate content. Unexpectedly, Claude outperformed other models, particularly in biological topics, while all LLMs struggled with abstract chemical concepts. Our findings provide practical insights for educators leveraging AI in early science education and offer guidance for developers working to enhance LLMs' educational applications. The results highlight the potential and current limitations of using LLMs to bridge the early childhood science literacy gap.