对于大型场馆（如体育场或娱乐场所）的安全保障工作，随机化方法是否比固定时间表更有效？令人惊讶的是，从多个角度来看答案是肯定的。本文综述了一项广泛研究的结果，包括对选定场馆安保主管的访谈和问卷调查。研究表明：随机化具有多重目标；许多安保主管认可其潜在价值；但实际采用随机化的很少。一些人担心如果敌人突破安全防线，他们无法为其随机方法辩护。另一些人则担忧员工可能无法有效执行随机化策略。我们讨论了随机化如何提高效率、如何向需要批准安保流程的相关人员有效证明其合理性，以及一些潜在的研究或监管进展。

Can randomness be better than scheduled practices, for securing an event at a large venue such as a stadium or entertainment arena? Perhaps surprisingly, from several perspectives the answer is "yes." This note examines findings from an extensive study of the problem, including interviews and a survey of selected venue security directors. That research indicates that: randomness has several goals; many security directors recognize its potential; but very few have used it much, if at all. Some fear they will not be able to defend using random methods if an adversary does slip through security. Others are concerned that staff may not be able to perform effectively. We discuss ways in which it appears that randomness can improve effectiveness, ways it can be effectively justified to those who must approve security processes, and some potential research or regulatory advances.