银河系中黑暗且动态的部分，包括银河系核球的整体形状及其运动特性以及暗致密天体群体（如假设存在的原初黑洞PBHs群体）的特性，由于其本质原因很难直接研究，但对理解宇宙却至关重要。幸运的是，通过引力微透镜这一追踪质量和动力学而非光的方法，可以唯一地研究这些谜团。利用OGLE-IV微透镜巡天在银核区域的观测数据，我们采用贝叶斯分层模型联合推断银河系的性质、致密天体的特征，并检验具有扩展质量分布的PBHs作为暗物质可行解释的可能性，这一工作扩展了之前针对小麦哲伦云和小麦哲伦云的研究，这两者事件率都低得多。我们的推断结果显示数据更倾向于银河系模型中的较低模式速度和致密天体的更宽质量谱。当我们向所优选的天体物理模型加入PBH成分时，发现贝叶斯因子$\ln\mathcal{B} = 20.23$偏好PBH模型。进一步分析这些结果表明，PBH模型的关键特征在于速度分布，它与天体物理对象的速度分布根本不同，且能够唯一解释大量低视差、短时间尺度的微透镜事件。注意到这种效应并非PBH所独有，我们考虑了这些结果应用于假设的PBH群体的含义，并讨论了其他可能的天体物理解释以及巡天或分析系统性的替代说明。

The dark and dynamic parts of the Galaxy, including the bulk shape and movement of the Galactic Bulge and characteristics of dark compact object populations, such as a hypothetical population of primordial black holes (PBHs), are difficult to study directly by their very nature, but are critical to our understanding of the universe. Fortunately, all of these mysteries can be uniquely studied via gravitational microlensing, a method of astronomical detection that traces mass and dynamics as opposed to light. Using the OGLE-IV microlensing survey bulge fields, we apply a Bayesian hierarchical model to jointly infer properties of the Galaxy, the characteristics of compact objects, and and test PBHs with an extended mass distribution as a test PBHs as a viable explanation of dark matter, extending work focused on the Small and Large Magellanic Clouds, both with much lower event-rates. We infer a preference within the data for a lower patternspeed in the galactic model and a wider mass spectrum for compact objects. When adding a PBH component to the favored astrophysical model from our initial investigations, we find a Bayes factor of $\ln\mathcal{B} = 20.23$ preferring the PBH model. Upon further investigation of these results, we find the critical feature in the PBH model to be the velocity distribution, which is fundamentally different than the velocity distribution of astrophysical objects and uniquely able to explain a large number of low parallax, low timescale microlensing events. Noting that this effect is not unique to PBHs, we consider the implications of these results as applied to a hypothetical population of PBHs and discuss alternative explanations, including a variety of other possible astrophysical and survey or analysis systematics.