本文评估了放射治疗质量保证中使用的标准束流轮廓对称性度量的准确性，并将其与提出的对称关联指数度量和结构相似性指数进行了比较。目标是提出一种基于交叉相关的新方法，称为对称关联指数，我们证明其比传统方法对噪声的敏感性更低。此外，还提出了一个补充方法，即结构相似性指数。通过模拟具有相似左右面积的非对称束流，比较了所提出方法和标准方法量化束流对称性的有效性。为了评估每种度量方法对噪声的依赖性，在一个受噪声影响的模拟非对称束流轮廓上对所有度量方法进行了评估。还进行了标准方法和所提出方法的比较，以表征在水箱中不同深度测量的大致对称束流轮廓的对称性。在量化束流对称性时，对于非对称且有噪声的情况，提出的关联指数方法和结构相似性指数方法分别得到了0.387和0.5401的值，而传统的点差商和基于面积的对称性方法分别得到了0.312和0.400的值。对于无噪声和有噪声的非对称情况，点差商、基于面积的对称值、结构相似性指数测量和关联对称指数之间的百分比变化分别为0.111、0.056、0.1625和0.008。对于临床测量的对称轮廓，所有方法得到的值均高于0.9。定量和定性指标的比较表明，当束流轮廓存在噪声时，提出的关联对称指数方法优于点对点和基于面积的对称性指标。

This work assess the accuracy of standard profile beam symmetry metrics used in radiotherapy quality assurance and compare them to the proposed correlative symmetric index metric and Structural similarity index. The objective is to propose a new method based on cross correlation, named correlative symmetric index, that we show is less susceptible to noise than traditional methods. In addition, a supplemental method called Structural Similarity Index is presented.Simulations of non symmetric beams with similar left and right areas were used to compare the effectiveness of quantifying beam symmetry through proposed and standard methods. To assess each metric dependence on noise, an assessment was performed on all metrics using a noisy, simulated, non symmetric beam profile. A comparison of standard and proposed methods was also performed to characterize beam symmetry of roughly symmetric beam profiles measures at different depths in a water tank.In quantifying beam symmetry, the proposed correlative index metric and Structural Similarity Index method resulted in values 0.387, 0.5401, respectively for the non symmetric noisy scenario. More traditional approaches of PDQ and area based symmetry resulted in values of 0.312 and 0.400, respectively, for the non symmetric noisy scenario. The corresponding percentage change between the non symmetric no noise and the non symmetric with noise for the Point Difference Quotient, area based symmetric value, Structural Similarity Index Measurement, and Correlative symmetric index were 0.111, 0.056, 0.1625, 0.008, respectively. For the clinical measured symmetric profiles all methods achieved values above 0.9. Comparisons of quantitative and qualitative metrics demonstrate that the proposed correlative symmetry index method outperforms both the pointwise and area based symmetric metrics for when beam profiles are noisy.