在因果文献中，符号非参数界限用于部分识别因果效应的历史已相当悠久。尖锐界限（即尽可能利用所有可用信息使值域范围最窄的界限）通常是目标。因此，许多研究致力于推导尖锐界限，但这一概念具有细微差别且可能产生误导。在存在辅助协变量的情况下，情况变得更加复杂。我们为协变量条件界限的点态和一致尖锐性提供了清晰定义，并以此证明了一些关于这两个概念之间关系的一般性和特定于工具变量（IV）设定的结果。正如我们所展示的，确定一般条件要困难得多，因此，我们敦促作者在通过条件加入辅助协变量时明确感兴趣的设定和所作假设。

Symbolic nonparametric bounds for partial identification of causal effects now have a long history in the causal literature. Sharp bounds, bounds that use all available information to make the range of values as narrow as possible, are often the goal. For this reason, many publications have focused on deriving sharp bounds, but the concept of sharp bounds is nuanced and can be misleading. In settings with ancillary covariates, the situation becomes more complex. We provide clear definitions for pointwise and uniform sharpness of covariate-conditional bounds, that we then use to prove some general and some specific to the IV setting results about the relationship between these two concepts. As we demonstrate, general conditions are much more difficult to determine and thus, we urge authors to be clear when including ancillary covariates in bounds via conditioning about the setting of interest and the assumptions made.