约翰内斯·开普勒试图利用其柏拉图固体模型解释太阳系内六颗最靠近恒星的行星排列，该模型假设行星轨道嵌套于五种柏拉图立体之中，但最终未能成功。尽管他的模型无法描述我们自己的行星系统，但在假设存在符合这一几何框架的系外行星系统方面，开普勒展现了惊人的预见性。在这项研究中，我们分析了所有已知包含三到六颗行星的多行星系外行星系统，并识别出与开普勒柏拉图模型最为匹配的系统。通过定义半长轴比值度量（即观测值与理论值之间半长轴比值差异平方和），我们发现最匹配的三、四、五、六颗行星的系外行星系统表现出显著更低的偏差值（分别为$4.38 \times 10^{-6}$、$1.05 \times 10^{-2}$、$8.21 \times 10^{-2}$和$2.43 \times 10^{-1}$），而太阳系内部的六颗行星对应的偏差值为12.68。这些结果表明，开普勒的柏拉图模型适用于某些系外行星系统，这暗示虽然太阳系不符合这种理想化的结构，但其他行星系统可能受制于与开普勒愿景相似的几何和数学原理。这项研究突显了这些系外行星系统的特殊性及其潜在的与柏拉图五元素框架的对齐可能性。

Johannes Kepler's attempt to explain the arrangement of the six innermost planets of the Solar System using his Platonic Solid Model-which postulates that planetary orbits are nested within the five Platonic solids-was ultimately unsuccessful. However, while his model failed to describe our own planetary system, Kepler was remarkably prescient in hypothesizing the existence of exoplanetary systems that might conform to this geometric framework. In this study, we analyze all known multiple exoplanet systems containing three to six planets and identify those that best match the Keplerian Platonic model. Using a semi-major-axis (SMA) ratio metric defined as the sum of squared differences between observed and theoretical semi-major-axis ratios, we find that the most well-matched three-, four-, five-, and six-planet exoplanetary systems exhibit significantly lower discrepancy values $(4.38 \times 10^{-6}, 1.05 \times 10^{-2}, 8.21 \times 10^{-2}$, and $2.43 \times 10^{-1}$, respectively) compared to the inner six planets of the Solar System at 12.68. These results demonstrate that Kepler's Platonic Model is applicable to certain exoplanetary systems, suggesting that while the Solar System does not adhere to this idealized structure, other planetary systems may be governed by underlying geometric and mathematical principles akin to Kepler's vision. This study highlights the special nature of these exoplanetary systems and their potential alignment with the Platonic five-element framework.