大多数业务气候服务提供者基于初始化的一般环流模型（GCMs）或拟合过去观测值的统计技术进行季节预测。GCMs需要大量的计算资源，这限制了它们的能力。相比之下，由于历史记录较短，统计方法往往缺乏稳健性。近期的研究提出利用气候模型输出训练的机器学习方法，利用更大的样本量和模拟场景。然而，许多这些研究关注的预测任务可能在空间范围或时间覆盖方面受到限制，与现有的业务预测存在差距。因此，本研究评估了一种结合变分推断和Transformer模型的方法来预测季节异常场的有效性。预测涵盖四季，并在每个季节开始前一个月进行初始化。该模型使用CMIP6的气候模型输出进行训练，并使用ERA5再分析数据进行测试。我们分析了该方法在预测年际异常方面的表现，这些异常超越了由气候变化引起的趋势。我们还在区域背景下测试了所提出的方案，重点关注欧洲的应用案例。尽管气候变化趋势主导了温度预测的技巧，但在受已知遥相关影响的地区，该方法相对于气候学预测表现出额外的技巧。基于降水预测的验证，我们也得出了相似的结论。尽管在大多数热带地区表现不如SEAS5，但我们的模型在许多温带内陆地区提供了附加价值。这项工作展示了在气候模型输出上训练生成模型用于季节预测的有效性，提供了在用户应用相关的时标和提前期上具有技巧性的预测，超越了由气候变化引起的趋势。

Most operational climate services providers base their seasonal predictions on initialised general circulation models (GCMs) or statistical techniques that fit past observations. GCMs require substantial computational resources, which limits their capacity. In contrast, statistical methods often lack robustness due to short historical records. Recent works propose machine learning methods trained on climate model output, leveraging larger sample sizes and simulated scenarios. Yet, many of these studies focus on prediction tasks that might be restricted in spatial extent or temporal coverage, opening a gap with existing operational predictions. Thus, the present study evaluates the effectiveness of a methodology that combines variational inference with transformer models to predict fields of seasonal anomalies. The predictions cover all four seasons and are initialised one month before the start of each season. The model was trained on climate model output from CMIP6 and tested using ERA5 reanalysis data. We analyse the method's performance in predicting interannual anomalies beyond the climate change-induced trend. We also test the proposed methodology in a regional context with a use case focused on Europe. While climate change trends dominate the skill of temperature predictions, the method presents additional skill over the climatological forecast in regions influenced by known teleconnections. We reach similar conclusions based on the validation of precipitation predictions. Despite underperforming SEAS5 in most tropics, our model offers added value in numerous extratropical inland regions. This work demonstrates the effectiveness of training generative models on climate model output for seasonal predictions, providing skilful predictions beyond the induced climate change trend at time scales and lead times relevant for user applications.