减少部分容积效应改善乳腺癌组织钠浓度定量:初步研究
Improved tissue sodium concentration quantification in breast cancer by reducing partial volume effects: a preliminary study
摘要 Abstract
引言:在钠(23Na)磁共振成像(MRI)中,部分容积效应(PVE)是体内组织钠浓度(TSC)量化误差最常见的原因之一。研究表明,先进的图像重建算法,如压缩感知(CS),可能有助于减少PVE。因此,我们探讨了基于CS的方法在乳腺癌(BC)患者中提高图像质量和TSC量化准确性方面的可行性。对象与方法:本研究在7T MRI扫描仪上对三名健康参与者和十二名女性乳腺癌患者进行了检查。我们使用加权全变分(wTV)、方向性全变分(dTV)、解剖学引导全变分(AG-TV)以及自适应组合(ADC)重建技术重构了23Na-MRI图像,并评估了图像质量。我们使用Dice评分评估钠数据中肿瘤体积描绘的一致性,并为不同的图像重建方法进行TSC量化。结果:所有方法均提供了乳房良好的钠图像质量。wTV、dTV和AG-TV的平均Dice评分分别为65%、72%和75%。在乳腺肿瘤中,平均TSC值分别为83.0、72.0、80.0和84.0 mmol/L。dTV与wTV之间(p<0.001)、dTV与AG-TV之间(p<0.001)以及dTV与ADC算法之间(p<0.001)存在显著差异。结论:本研究结果显示,肿瘤表现和TSC估计可能存在差异,这可能取决于所使用的图像重建类型和参数,最有可能是因为它们在减少PVE方面的稳健性不同。
Introduction: In sodium (23Na) MRI, partial volume effects (PVE) are one of the most common causes of errors in the quantification of tissue sodium concentration (TSC) in vivo. Advanced image reconstruction algorithms, such as compressed sensing (CS), have been shown to potentially reduce PVE. Therefore, we investigated the feasibility of CS-based methods for image quality and TSC quantification accuracy improvement in patients with breast cancer (BC). Subjects and Methods: Three healthy participants and 12 female participants with BC were examined on a 7T MRI scanner in this study. We reconstructed 23Na-MRI images using the weighted total variation (wTV) and directional total variation (dTV), anatomically guided total variation (AG-TV), and adaptive combine (ADC) reconstruction and performed image quality assessment. We evaluated agreement in tumor volumes delineated on sodium data using the Dice score and performed TSC quantification for different image reconstruction approaches. Results: All methods provided sodium images of the breast with good quality. The mean Dice scores for wTV, dTV, and AG-TV were 65%, 72%, and 75%, respectively. In the breast tumors, average TSC values were 83.0, 72.0, 80.0, and 84.0 mmol/L, respectively. There was a significant difference between dTV and wTV (p<0.001), as well as between dTV and AG-TV (p<0.001) and dTV and ADC algorithm (p<0.001). Conclusion: The results of this study showed that there are differences in tumor appearance and TSC estimations that might be depending on the type of image reconstruction and parameters used, most likely due to differences in their robustness in reducing PVE.