中子超镜（SMs）是许多散射和粒子物理实验的重要组成部分。迄今为止，由于其饱和磁化强度低于镍/钛超镜，镍（钼）/钛超镜被用于需要传输极化中子束的实验中。然而，下一代β衰变实验要求超镜在每次反射中的退极化率低于10⁻⁴，以达到目标精度。目前，镍（钼）/钛超镜反射极化中子束的退极化程度尚未达到这一精度水平。最近开发的铜/钛超镜具有比镍（钼）/钛更低的饱和磁化强度，可能成为一种替代方案。本文测试了这两种镜片的性能。首先，我们在超级ADAM中子反射仪上测量了镍（钼）和铜单层的四态极化中子反射（PNR）曲线，并进行了完整的极化分析，结果显示两种材料的磁散射长度密度（mSLD）存在差异，铜的mSLD低于镍（钼）。这些结果通过Ni（钼）/Ti和Cu/Ti双层超镜的四态PNR曲线的完整极化分析得到了证实。其次，我们使用不透明测试平台装置测量了极化中子束在反射自相同镍（钼）/钛和铜/钛超镜后的退极化（D）程度。我们发现，在1σ置信水平下，Cu/Ti(4N5)的退极化率为D_Cu/Ti(4N5)<7.6×10⁻⁵，Ni(Mo)/Ti的退极化率为D_Ni(Mo)/Ti<8.5×10⁻⁵，Cu/Ti(2N6)的退极化率为D_Cu/Ti(2N6)<6.0×10⁻⁵，其中（4N5）对应于99.995%的钛纯度，（2N6）对应于99.6%的钛纯度。这些不确定度是统计性的。这些结果表明，这三种超镜均适合用于下一代β衰变实验。我们没有发现D值对q值或样品所处磁场有显著依赖性。

Neutron supermirrors (SMs) are a crucial part of many scattering and particle physics experiments. So far, Ni(Mo)/Ti SMs have been used in experiments that require to transport a polarized neutron beam due to their lower saturation magnetization compared to Ni/Ti SMs. However, next generation $\beta$ decay experiments require SMs that depolarize below $10^{-4}$ per reflection to reach their targeted precision. The depolarization of a polarized neutron beam due to reflection from Ni(Mo)/Ti SMs has not yet been measured to that precision. Recently developed Cu/Ti SMs with a very low saturation magnetization compared to Ni(Mo)/Ti may serve as an alternative. In this paper, we test the performance of both mirrors. At a first stage, we present four-states polarized neutron reflectivity (PNR) curves of Ni(Mo) and Cu monolayers measured at the neutron reflectometer SuperADAM and perform a full polarization analysis, showing a difference between the magnetic scattering length density (mSLD) of both materials, with Cu having a lower mSLD than Ni(Mo). These results are corroborated with the full polarization analysis of four-states PNR curves of $m=2$ Ni(Mo)/Ti and Cu/Ti SMs. In a second stage, we measured the depolarization ($D$) that a polarized neutron beam suffers after reflection from the same Ni(Mo)/Ti and Cu/Ti SMs by using the Opaque Test Bench setup. We find upper limits for the depolarization of $D_\text{Cu/Ti(4N5)}<7.6\times 10^{-5}$, $D_\text{Ni(Mo)/Ti}<8.5\times 10^{-5}$, and $D_\text{Cu/Ti(2N6)}<6.0\times 10^{-5}$ at the $1\sigma$ confidence level, where (4N5) corresponds to a Ti purity of $99.995\%$ and (2N6) to $99.6\%$. The uncertainties are statistical. These results show that all three SMs are suitable for being used in next generation $\beta$ decay experiments. We found no noticeable dependence of $D$ on the $q$ value or the magnetizing field, in which the samples were placed.