我们研究了群体间竞争的信息披露策略。每位参与者内生决定是否作为群体的一员参与竞争。群体内部的努力聚合采用最佳射手规则，即群体的表现由其成员中最高的投资决定。我们考虑了一种广义的全支付拍卖设定，在这种设定下，表现最好的群体将以确定的方式赢得竞争。在参赛阶段，玩家赢得比赛的价值是私人信息，但可能在竞争阶段被披露。我们比较了三种信息披露政策：(i) 不披露，此时参赛人数未知且玩家价值保密；(ii) 群体内披露，此时该信息仅在每个群体内部披露而不在群体之间披露；(iii) 完全披露，此时参赛者的信息在群体之间披露。对于个体间竞争的基准情况，信息披露总是会减少预期的总投资。然而，在群体竞争中，这一结论不再成立：群体内披露明确提高了总的投资量，而完全披露的效果则不明确。

We study information disclosure policies for contests among groups. Each player endogenously decides whether or not to participate in competition as a member of their group. Within-group aggregation of effort is best-shot, i.e., each group's performance is determined by the highest investment among its members. We consider a generalized all-pay auction setting, in which the group with the highest performance wins the contest with certainty. Players' values for winning are private information at the entry stage, but may be disclosed at the competition stage. We compare three disclosure policies: (i) no disclosure, when the number of entrants remains unknown and their values private; (ii) within-group disclosure, when this information is disclosed within each group but not across groups; and (iii) full disclosure, when the information about entrants is disclosed across groups. For the benchmark case of contests between individuals, information disclosure always reduces expected aggregate investment. However, this is no longer true in group contests: Within-group disclosure unambiguously raises aggregate investment, while the effect of full disclosure is ambiguous.