多细胞肿瘤球体（MCTS）是评估组合放（化）疗影响的先进细胞培养系统。它们从三维细胞-细胞和细胞-基质相互作用到与增殖活性和营养/氧气供应相关的径向病理生理梯度，表现出治疗相关的体内类似特性，从而改变细胞的放射敏感性。最先进的测定方法基于在每个照射剂量和治疗组中来自大量处理后的肿瘤球体的收集亮场图像时间序列，量化长期治愈终点。这里，根据Kaplan-Meier曲线记录了类似体内的肿瘤控制概率。这些分析需要对每种治疗组的多达100,000张图像进行繁琐的肿瘤球体分割，以从图像中提取相关结构信息，例如直径、面积、体积和圆形度。尽管有几种图像分析算法可用于肿瘤球体分割，但它们都专注于在整个生长过程中具有明显外缘的紧凑型MCTS。然而，处理后的MCTS可能部分脱落和破坏，并且通常被死细胞碎片遮挡。我们成功训练了两种全卷积网络，UNet和HRNet，并优化其超参数，以开发用于未处理和处理后的MCTS的自动分割方法。我们在来自两个人类头颈部癌细胞系的更大独立数据集上系统地验证了自动分割。我们发现大多数图像的手动和自动分割之间具有极好的重叠，通过约90%的Jaccard指数量化。对于分割重叠较小的图像，我们证明这种误差与不同生物专家之间的分割变化相当，这表明这些图像是生物学上不清楚或模糊的情况。

Multicellular tumor spheroids (MCTS) are advanced cell culture systems for assessing the impact of combinatorial radio(chemo)therapy. They exhibit therapeutically relevant in-vivo-like characteristics from 3D cell-cell and cell-matrix interactions to radial pathophysiological gradients related to proliferative activity and nutrient/oxygen supply, altering cellular radioresponse. State-of-the-art assays quantify long-term curative endpoints based on collected brightfield image time series from large treated spheroid populations per irradiation dose and treatment arm. Here, spheroid control probabilities are documented analogous to in-vivo tumor control probabilities based on Kaplan-Meier curves. This analyses require laborious spheroid segmentation of up to 100.000 images per treatment arm to extract relevant structural information from the images, e.g., diameter, area, volume and circularity. While several image analysis algorithms are available for spheroid segmentation, they all focus on compact MCTS with clearly distinguishable outer rim throughout growth. However, treated MCTS may partly be detached and destroyed and are usually obscured by dead cell debris. We successfully train two Fully Convolutional Networks, UNet and HRNet, and optimize their hyperparameters to develop an automatic segmentation for both untreated and treated MCTS. We systematically validate the automatic segmentation on larger, independent data sets of spheroids derived from two human head-and-neck cancer cell lines. We find an excellent overlap between manual and automatic segmentation for most images, quantified by Jaccard indices at around 90%. For images with smaller overlap of the segmentations, we demonstrate that this error is comparable to the variations across segmentations from different biological experts, suggesting that these images represent biologically unclear or ambiguous cases.