虽然机器学习（ML）仍然是一个相对较新的研究领域，尤其是在抽象数学和计算机科学之外，关于大型语言模型（LLMs）的政治方面的研究工作很少，特别是关于对齐过程及其政治维度的研究更为有限。这一过程可能简单如提示工程，但也非常复杂，且可能影响完全不相关的问题。例如，有政治导向的对齐过程对LLMs的嵌入空间以及此类空间中政治概念的相对位置具有很强的影响。通过使用特殊工具评估总体政治偏见并分析对齐的影响，我们可以收集新数据以了解其原因及其对社会的潜在后果。实际上，通过采取社会政治视角，我们可以假设大多数大型LLMs都与马克思主义哲学所说的“占主导地位的思想体系”保持一致。由于人工智能在政治决策中的作用——无论是对公民层面还是政府机构层面而言，这种偏见可能会对社会变革产生巨大影响，要么通过创造新的、隐晦的社会一致性路径，要么通过允许伪装的极端主义观点在人群中传播。

As Machine Learning (ML) is still a recent field of study, especially outside the realm of abstract Mathematics and Computer Science, few works have been conducted on the political aspect of large Language Models (LLMs), and more particularly about the alignment process and its political dimension. This process can be as simple as prompt engineering but is also very complex and can affect completely unrelated notions. For example, politically directed alignment has a very strong impact on an LLM's embedding space and the relative position of political notions in such a space. Using special tools to evaluate general political bias and analyze the effects of alignment, we can gather new data to understand its causes and possible consequences on society. Indeed, by taking a socio-political approach, we can hypothesize that most big LLMs are aligned with what Marxist philosophy calls the 'dominant ideology.' As AI's role in political decision-making, at the citizen's scale but also in government agencies, such biases can have huge effects on societal change, either by creating new and insidious pathways for societal uniformity or by allowing disguised extremist views to gain traction among the people.