摘要 Abstract
在未来气候变迁相关的深层对流崩溃背景下,亚极地涡旋存在越过临界点的风险。由于此类临界点变化可能带来显著的气候影响,因此理解其背后的机制并评估这些机制在现代气候模型中的表现尤为重要。本研究利用因果推断方法探讨了CMIP6模型中几种被提出的亚极地涡旋变率机制。正如预期,几乎所有CMIP6模型中,海表盐度增加或海表温度降低均会因深层对流增强而导致混合层深度增加。然而,由对流引起的海表温度因重分层而发生的变化在模型中表现得不够充分。在大多数模型中,海表盐度增加导致的混合层加深确实会在中间水深处引发冷却效应。从次表层温度通过密度反馈到亚极地涡旋环流强度的联系则更为复杂,仅有少数模型显示出显著的相关性,且这些模型之间对该反馈的符号也未达成一致。其中,有一款模型(CESM2)包含了所有被提出的相关机制,并同时包含负反馈和延迟正反馈回路。
The subpolar gyre is at risk of crossing a tipping point under future climate change associated with the collapse of deep convection. As such tipping can have significant climate impacts, it is important to understand the mechanisms at play and how they are represented in modern climate models. In this study we use causal inference to investigate the representation of several proposed mechanisms of subpolar gyre variability in CMIP6 models. As expected, an increase in sea surface salinity or a decrease in sea surface temperature leads to an increase in mixed layer depth in nearly all CMIP6 models due to an intensification of deep convection. However, the effect of convection to modify sea surface temperature due to restratification is less well captured. In most models the deepening of the mixed layer caused by an increase of sea surface salinity, does result in a cooling of the water at intermediate depths. The feedback from the subsurface temperature through density to the strength of the subpolar gyre circulation is more ambiguous, with fewer models indicating a significant link. Those that do show a significant link, do not agree on its sign. One model (CESM2) contains all proposed mechanisms, with both a negative and delayed positive feedback loop.