基于天空图像的辐照度短时预报深度学习方法对比研究

Benchmarking Deep Learning-Based Methods for Irradiance Nowcasting with Sky Images

摘要 Abstract

针对光伏发电中高不确定性问题,近年来越来越多的研究聚焦于短期太阳能预报。大多数研究通过深度学习模型直接利用天空图像序列预测辐照度或光伏发电值。然而,近期生成建模的进步催生了一种新方法,将预报问题分解为两个子问题:1)未来事件预测,即生成未来的天空图像;2)辐照度或光伏发电短时预报,即从单张图像预测同步值。SkyGPT模型展示了短时预报模型较生成模型具有更大的改进潜力。本文专注于辐照度短时预报问题,在广泛使用的Folsom、SIRTA和NREL数据集上对多种深度学习架构进行了全面评估。此外,我们还针对不同的训练配置和数据处理技术(包括用于训练的目标变量选择以及图像与辐照测量之间时间戳对齐的调整)进行了消融实验。特别指出,我们注意到Folsom数据集中天空图像时间戳可能存在的误差,并讨论了潜在的解决方法。所有结果均以均方根误差和平均绝对误差两种指标报告,并借助三个数据集证明了我们的发现具有一致性。

To address the high levels of uncertainty associated with photovoltaic energy, an increasing number of studies focusing on short-term solar forecasting have been published. Most of these studies use deep learning-based models to directly forecast a solar irradiance or photovoltaic power value given an input of sky image sequences. Recently, however, advances in generative modeling have led to approaches that divide the forecasting problem into two sub-problems: 1) future event prediction, i.e. generating future sky images; and 2) solar irradiance or photovoltaic power nowcasting, i.e. predicting the concurrent value from a single image. One such approach is the SkyGPT model, where they show that the potential for improvement is much larger for the nowcasting model than for the generative model. Thus, in this paper, we focus on the solar irradiance nowcasting problem and conduct an extensive benchmark of deep learning architectures across the widely-used Folsom, SIRTA and NREL datasets. Moreover, we perform ablation experiments on different training configurations and data processing techniques, including the choice of the target variable used for training and adjustments of the timestamp alignment between images and irradiance measurements. In particular, we draw attention to a potential error associated with the sky image timestamps in the Folsom dataset and a possible fix is discussed. All our results are reported in terms of both the root mean squared error and the mean absolute error and, by leveraging the three datasets, we demonstrate that our findings are consistent across different solar stations.