投标 vs. 贸易:为风电与氢能销售制定线性决策策略的学习方法
Betting vs. Trading: Learning a Linear Decision Policy for Selling Wind Power and Hydrogen
摘要 Abstract
我们为结合风力涡轮机和电解槽的混合发电厂开发了一种投标策略,构建了日前电力市场的价格-数量投标曲线,并优化安排氢气生产。在没有风险管理的情况下,单边不平衡定价会导致“孤注一掷”的交易策略,我们称之为“投标”。为了解决这个问题,我们提出了一种数据驱动的实际方法,利用上下文信息来训练功率投标和氢气调度的线性决策政策。通过引入显式的风险约束来限制不平衡,我们从“孤注一掷”的方法转向了“贸易”策略,使电厂能够分散其电力交易决策。我们在三种场景下评估了该模型:当电厂有条件允许、始终允许或不允许从电网购买电力时,这会影响所生产的氢气的绿色认证。通过将我们的数据驱动策略与具有完美预测能力的oracle模型进行比较,我们表明,采用风险约束的数据驱动方法能够提供令人满意的表现。
We develop a bidding strategy for a hybrid power plant combining co-located wind turbines and an electrolyzer, constructing a price-quantity bidding curve for the day-ahead electricity market while optimally scheduling hydrogen production. Without risk management, single imbalance pricing leads to an all-or-nothing trading strategy, which we term 'betting'. To address this, we propose a data-driven, pragmatic approach that leverages contextual information to train linear decision policies for both power bidding and hydrogen scheduling. By introducing explicit risk constraints to limit imbalances, we move from the all-or-nothing approach to a 'trading" strategy', where the plant diversifies its power trading decisions. We evaluate the model under three scenarios: when the plant is either conditionally allowed, always allowed, or not allowed to buy power from the grid, which impacts the green certification of the hydrogen produced. Comparing our data-driven strategy with an oracle model that has perfect foresight, we show that the risk-constrained, data-driven approach delivers satisfactory performance.