政治意见动态因果机制的研究:具有社区限定社会影响的分层粗粒化模型
An Investigation into the Causal Mechanism of Political Opinion Dynamics: A Model of Hierarchical Coarse-Graining with Community-Bounded Social Influence
摘要 Abstract
民主社会中日益加剧的政治极化是政治意见动态的涌现结果。然而,从个体信念到集体共识的政治意见形成的根本机制仍然未知。我们认识到,一个因果机制必须同时考虑自下而上和自上而下的影响,因此将政治意见动态概念化为分层粗粒化过程,其中微观层面的意见整合为宏观层面的状态变量。利用CODA(连续意见离散行动)模型,我们模拟了贝叶斯意见更新、基于社会身份的信息整合以及社会身份群体间的迁移,以表示更高级别的连通性,从而在微观、介观和宏观层面实现粗粒化。研究结果显示,更高级别的连通性塑造了信息整合,形成了三种模式:独立模式(孤立、局部收敛)、并行模式(快速、全局收敛)和迭代模式(缓慢、逐步收敛)。在迭代模式中,较低的连通性促进了暂时的多样性,表明一种知情的共识。在所有模式中,时间尺度分离导致下行因果关系,即代理人向多数选择聚合,推动共识形成。至关重要的是,任何程度的一致性更高的级别信息整合都可以通过全球下行因果关系克服错位现象。研究结果强调了因果机制的涌现特性,如下行因果关系,对于达成共识的重要性,并可能为更精确地研究极化的政治话语提供启示。
The increasing polarization in democratic societies is an emergent outcome of political opinion dynamics. Yet, the fundamental mechanisms behind the formation of political opinions, from individual beliefs to collective consensus, remain unknown. Understanding that a causal mechanism must account for both bottom-up and top-down influences, we conceptualize political opinion dynamics as hierarchical coarse-graining, where microscale opinions integrate into a macro-scale state variable. Using the CODA (Continuous Opinions Discrete Actions) model, we simulate Bayesian opinion updating, social identity-based information integration, and migration between social identity groups to represent higher-level connectivity. This results in coarse-graining across micro, meso, and macro levels. Our findings show that higher-level connectivity shapes information integration, yielding three regimes: independent (disconnected, local convergence), parallel (fast, global convergence), and iterative (slow, stepwise convergence). In the iterative regime, low connectivity fosters transient diversity, indicating an informed consensus. In all regimes, time-scale separation leads to downward causation, where agents converge on the aggregate majority choice, driving consensus. Critically, any degree of coherent higher-level information integration can overcome misalignment via global downward causation. The results highlight how emergent properties of the causal mechanism, such as downward causation, are essential for consensus and may inform more precise investigations into polarized political discourse.