快速且准确地模拟复杂几何体周围的流体力学对于航空航天、生物医学流体等众多工程和科学应用至关重要。尽管科学机器学习（Scientific Machine Learning, SciML）展现出巨大潜力，但现有研究大多局限于简单几何形状，而对复杂的现实场景关注不足。本文通过针对复杂几何形状流场预测，对多种SciML模型（包括神经算子和基于视觉变换器的基础模型）进行基准测试，填补了这一空白。利用包含多种几何形状稳态流场的高保真数据集，我们评估了几何表示（符号距离场SDF和二值掩模）对模型准确性、可扩展性和泛化能力的影响。为此，我们引入了一种新颖的统一评分框架，整合了全局精度、边界层保真度和物理一致性指标，从而实现对模型性能的稳健比较。研究结果表明，较新的基础模型在数据受限的情况下显著优于神经算子，而SDF表示在充足训练数据下表现更优。然而，所有模型在分布外泛化方面均表现不佳，凸显了未来SciML应用的关键挑战。通过推进评价模型和建模能力，我们的工作为复杂几何形状流体力学问题提供了可靠且可扩展的机器学习解决方案。

Rapid and accurate simulations of fluid dynamics around complicated geometric bodies are critical in a variety of engineering and scientific applications, including aerodynamics and biomedical flows. However, while scientific machine learning (SciML) has shown considerable promise, most studies in this field are limited to simple geometries, and complex, real-world scenarios are underexplored. This paper addresses this gap by benchmarking diverse SciML models, including neural operators and vision transformer-based foundation models, for fluid flow prediction over intricate geometries. Using a high-fidelity dataset of steady-state flows across various geometries, we evaluate the impact of geometric representations -- Signed Distance Fields (SDF) and binary masks -- on model accuracy, scalability, and generalization. Central to this effort is the introduction of a novel, unified scoring framework that integrates metrics for global accuracy, boundary layer fidelity, and physical consistency to enable a robust, comparative evaluation of model performance. Our findings demonstrate that newer foundation models significantly outperform neural operators, particularly in data-limited scenarios, and that SDF representations yield superior results with sufficient training data. Despite these promises, all models struggle with out-of-distribution generalization, highlighting a critical challenge for future SciML applications. By advancing both evaluation models and modeling capabilities, our work paves the way for robust and scalable ML solutions for fluid dynamics across complex geometries.