相关性在科学的各个领域中起着至关重要的作用，特别是在量子力学中，但其恰当的量化仍是一个有争议的话题。本文旨在讨论定义可靠总相关性度量的挑战。我们首先概述了有效相关性度量应满足的重要性质，并回顾了现有的度量方法，包括量子互信息、相关矩阵的p-范数以及最近定义的量子皮尔逊相关系数。此外，我们基于Rényi和Tsallis相对熵以及Kullback-Leibler散度引入了新的度量方法。我们的分析表明，尽管量子互信息、p-范数和皮尔逊度量对于两量子比特系统表现出等价性，但它们都存在排序问题。尽管对其可靠性存在批评，但我们认为量子互信息仍然是总相关性的有效度量。

Correlations play a pivotal role in various fields of science, particularly in quantum mechanics, yet their proper quantification remains a subject of debate. In this work, we aim to discuss the challenge of defining a reliable measure of total correlations. We first outline essential properties that an effective correlation measure should satisfy and review existing measures, including quantum mutual information, the p-norm of the correlation matrix, and the recently defined quantum Pearson correlation coefficient. Additionally, we introduce new measures based on R\'enyi and Tsallis relative entropies, as well as the Kullback-Leibler divergence. Our analysis reveals that while quantum mutual information, the p-norm, and the Pearson measure exhibit equivalence for two-qubit systems, they all suffer from an ordering problem. Despite criticisms regarding its reliability, we argue that quantum mutual information remains a valid measure of total correlations.