本文探讨了类星体X射线和紫外辐射之间的非线性关系是否可用于推导其距离。在我们小组之前的工作中，已证明该关系的斜率在红移范围内没有演化。所得到的距离与标准平坦ΛCDM模型在红移z～1.5范围内一致，但在更高红移处显示出显著偏差。然而，有几位作者认为这种差异可能源于母样本中低红移和高红移源之间的一致性问题，或者是该关系的红移演化。在此，我们通过与超新星推导距离的定量比较讨论这些问题，并结合模拟表明，所有声称的不一致性都可能自然地源自用于数据分析的宇宙学模型的局限性，即我们对真实宇宙学的无知。我们认为，该方法的可靠性只能基于红移z>1.5时X射线到紫外辐射关系非演化的宇宙学无关评估，前提是仔细检查样本选择和流量测量中的可能红移相关系统效应。由于我们没有发现z>1.5时该关系归一化突然变化的任何物理原因，并且可以排除数据选择和流量测量中的严重系统误差，因此我们得出结论，应用X射线到紫外辐射关系于宇宙学是有充分依据的。为了进一步巩固这一点，我们需要更好地理解观测到的关系背后的物理过程和/或独立观测证据可能确认类星体与ΛCDM模型之间的差异，例如未来的红移z～2或更高的超新星测量。

In this paper we address the question whether the non-linear relation between the X-ray and UV emission of quasars can be used to derive their distances. In previous works of our group, we demonstrated that such a relation does not show any redshift evolution in its slope. The derived distances are in agreement with the standard flat $\Lambda$CDM model up to $z$$\sim$1.5, but they show significant deviations at higher redshifts. Yet, several authors suggested that this discrepancy is due to inconsistencies between the low- and high-redshift sources within the parent sample, or to a redshift evolution of the relation. Here, we discuss these issues through a quantitative comparison with supernova-derived distances in the common redshift range, complemented by simulations showing that all the claimed inconsistencies would naturally arise from any limitation of the cosmological model adopted for the data analysis, that is, from our ignorance of the true cosmology. We argue that the reliability of the method can only be based on a cosmology-independent evaluation of the hypothesis of non-evolution of the X-ray to UV relation at $z$>1.5, subsequent to a careful check of the sample selection and of the flux measurements for possible redshift-dependent systematic effects. Since we do not conceive any physical reason for a sudden change of the normalization of the relation at $z$>1.5, and we can exclude any severe systematic effect in the data selection and flux measurements, we conclude that the application of the X-ray to UV relation to cosmology is well motivated. To further strengthen this point, we need to achieve a better understanding of the physical process behind the observed relation and/or an independent observational proof possibly confirming the discrepancy with $\Lambda$CDM found with quasars, such as future supernova measurements at $z$$\sim$2 or higher.