经典成核理论（CNT）基于毛细管近似，即假设成核性质可以从熔体和晶体的体相性质推断出来。尽管CNT的简洁性和实用性毋庸置疑，但实验和模拟经常发现其预测与实际结果存在显著偏差，这些偏差通常通过CNT的经验扩展来调和，从而引发关于该理论普遍有效性的争论。在本研究中，我们提出了一个基于毛细管近似的任何成核理论的可证伪性检验方法。我们重点关注理论预测不同晶体多晶型物具有相同成核速率的情况。然后，我们引入了一个系统，在该系统中所有多晶型物在所有状态点下的自由能（体相和界面自由能）都相同。通过广泛的分子模拟，我们展示了这些多晶型物表现出显著不同的成核性质，直接反驳了CNT的预测。我们认为，CNT的主要局限在于忽略了液体相内的结构涨落。

Classical nucleation theory (CNT) is built upon the capillarity approximation, i.e., the assumption that the nucleation properties can be inferred from the bulk properties of the melt and the crystal. Although CNT's simplicity and usefulness cannot be overstated, experiments and simulations regularly uncover significant deviations from its predictions, which are often reconciled through phenomenological extensions of the CNT, fueling the debate over the general validity of the theory. In this study, we present a falsifiability test for any nucleation theory grounded in the capillarity approximation. We focus on cases where the theory predicts no differences in nucleation rates between different crystal polymorphs. We then introduce a system in which all polymorphs have the same free energy (both bulk and interfacial) across all state points. Through extensive molecular simulations, we show that the polymorphs exhibit remarkably different nucleation properties, directly contradicting CNT's predictions. We argue that CNT's primary limitation lies in its neglect of structural fluctuations within the liquid phase.