本文回顾并比较了参数回归模型背景下评估治疗效果异质性的方法。这些方法包括标准的似然比检验、bootstrap似然比检验以及由随机效应方差为零的检验启发的Goeman全局检验。我们特别关注基于治疗效果得分残差的检验，并探讨此类检验的不同变体。所有方法均在模拟研究中进行比较，并通过一个多重剂量与安慰剂对比的研究展示了基于残差得分的方法。我们的研究结果表明，基于得分残差的方法为识别治疗效果异质性和治疗效果修饰因子提供了实用、灵活且可靠的有效工具，可为关于治疗效果异质性的决策提供有益指导。

This paper reviews and compares methods to assess treatment effect heterogeneity in the context of parametric regression models. These methods include the standard likelihood ratio tests, bootstrap likelihood ratio tests, and Goeman's global test motivated by testing whether the random effect variance is zero. We place particular emphasis on tests based on the score-residual of the treatment effect and explore different variants of tests in this class. All approaches are compared in a simulation study, and the approach based on residual scores is illustrated in a study comparing multiple doses versus placebo. Our findings demonstrate that score-residual based methods provide practical, flexible and reliable tools for identifying treatment effect heterogeneity and treatment effect modifiers, and can provide useful guidance for decision making around treatment effect heterogeneity.