本研究对全球外交使团目录进行了比较评估。在十大全球服务中，战略性选择了DiplomaticMonitor.org、EmbassyPages.com和WikiData.org。通过对几乎所有可用的全球外交目录在线服务进行分析后，这三大平台因其代表了创建全球外交使团数据库的不同方法而被选中。我们以来自超过150个国家的官方外交名单为基准，评估了这些平台的数据覆盖范围、准确性以及更新频率。DiplomaticMonitor在结构、完整性和时效性方面始终优于其竞争对手，准确反映了大使任命周期，并在联系和人员记录方面保持高精度。尽管EmbassyPages具有强大的搜索引擎可见性和广泛使用率，但其数据时效性存在显著问题，大使信息准确性因刷新周期延迟而大幅下降。WikiData提供了有价值的历史文档和开源访问权限，但在可靠实时外交信息方面缺乏必要的一致性和验证协议。我们的研究结果突显了缺乏标准化全球外交使团登记册所带来的重大挑战。在这片碎片化的领域中，方法学严谨的第三方平台有时在质量和实用性上可以超越政府发布的记录。研究显示，在当代数字外交中，数据可靠性与机构渊源关系不大，而更依赖于严格、透明且一致的数据管理实践。

This study provides a comparative evaluation of global diplomatic mission directories. DiplomaticMonitor.org, EmbassyPages.com, and WikiData.org are strategically selected among the top ten global services. After analyzing nearly all available online global diplomatic directory services, these three platforms are selected as they represent fundamentally different approaches to creating worldwide diplomatic mission databases. Using official diplomatic lists from over 150 countries as benchmarks, we assessed data coverage, accuracy, and update frequency across these platforms. DiplomaticMonitor consistently outperforms its counterparts in structure, completeness, and timeliness, accurately reflecting ambassadorial appointment cycles and maintaining high precision across contact and personnel records. EmbassyPages, despite strong search engine visibility and widespread usage, exhibits significant data currency issues, with markedly diminished ambassadorial accuracy attributable to delayed refresh cycles. WikiData offers valuable historical documentation and open-source accessibility but lacks the consistency and verification protocols necessary for reliable real-time diplomatic information. Our findings highlight the critical challenge posed by the absence of a standardized global diplomatic mission registry. In this fragmented landscape, methodologically rigorous third-party platforms can occasionally surpass government-published records in quality and utility. The research demonstrates that in contemporary digital diplomacy, data reliability correlates less with institutional provenance than with disciplined, transparent, and consistent data stewardship practices.