我们考虑一个垄断保险市场，其中保险公司是风险中性的且追求利润最大化，而消费者具有Yaari双重视效偏好，该偏好会扭曲给定的连续损失分布。保险公司观察到损失分布，但无法直接观测消费者的隐含风险态度，这些风险态度由从一系列类型中抽取的变形函数所代表。我们刻画了利润最大化的、激励相容的以及个体合理的保险合同菜单，并证明均衡是分离的，同时给出了其关键属性。特别地，保险覆盖范围和保费在风险厌恶程度上单调递增；风险厌恶程度最高的消费者获得全额保险（“顶部效率”）；垄断者从风险厌恶程度最低的消费者那里吸收全部剩余；风险厌恶程度较高的消费者为保险公司带来更高的预期利润。在某些正则条件下，可以以每类消费者的边际损失保留量来描述均衡合同，它们由分层免赔额合同的菜单组成，每一组分层结构由消费者的隐含风险类型决定。此外，我们还考察了固定保险提供成本对均衡的影响。我们证明，如果固定成本过高，则不存在“事前”的贸易收益。然而，当交易发生时，分离均衡合同始终优于池化均衡合同，并且除了排除部分菜单外，与无固定成本情况下的合同相同；被排除的合同是为相对较低风险厌恶的消费者设计的，这些消费者对保险公司而言价值较小。最后，我们在任意类型空间背景下刻画了激励有效的合同菜单。

We consider a monopoly insurance market with a risk-neutral profit-maximizing insurer and a consumer with Yaari Dual Utility preferences that distort the given continuous loss distribution. The insurer observes the loss distribution but not the risk attitude of the consumer, proxied by a distortion function drawn from a continuum of types. We characterize the profit-maximizing, incentive-compatible, and individually rational menus of insurance contracts, show that equilibria are separating, and provide key properties thereof. Notably, insurance coverage and premia are monotone in the level of risk aversion; the most risk-averse consumer receives full insurance $(\textit{efficiency at the top})$; the monopoly absorbs all surplus from the least-risk averse consumer; and consumers with a higher level of risk aversion induce a higher expected profit for the insurer. Under certain regularity conditions, equilibrium contracts can be characterized in terms of the marginal loss retention per type of consumer, and they consist of menus of layered deductible contracts, where each such layered structure is determined by the risk type of the consumer. In addition, we examine the effect of a fixed insurance provision cost on equilibria. We show that if the fixed cost is prohibitively high, then there will be no $\textit{ex ante}$ gains from trade. However, when trade occurs, separating equilibrium contracts always outperform pooling equilibrium contracts, and they are identical to those obtained in the absence of fixed costs, with the exception that only part of the menu is excluded. The excluded contracts are those designed for consumers with relatively lower risk aversion, who are less valuable to the insurer. Finally, we characterize incentive-efficient menus of contracts in the context of an arbitrary type space.