以往研究表明，采用基于证据的教学方法不仅能提高所有学生的学习效果，还能缩小性别差距。我们描述了基于物理学教育研究的教学技巧在翻转课堂和非翻转课堂主动学习环境中的影响，分析了通过验证的概念调查所观察到的性别差距。我们将大量采用基于证据的主动学习（EBAE）策略的男性和女性学生的成绩与主要采用讲授式教学（LB）的课程进行了比较。这里呈现的分析数据来自两学期的大学物理代数基础和微积分基础入门课程序列。第一和第二学期课程中用于评估学生学习的调查分别是力概念库存表和电磁学概念调查。我们将特定水平上EBAE课程中的男性和女性学生的成绩与LB课程的成绩进行了对比：(I) 同一位教师教授了两门课程，一门为EBAE课程，另一门为LB课程，而作业、习题课和期末考试保持一致；(II) 对不同教师教授的所有EBAE课程的学生表现进行平均，并与类型相同的由不同教师教授的LB课程的平均表现进行比较。在所有情况下，我们发现，即使在没有统计学意义上的前置测试差异的情况下，大量采用EBAE策略的课程中的学生平均成绩仍优于相同类型的以LB教学为主的课程中的学生。然而，在使用EBAE方法的课程中，性别差距仍然存在。我们还讨论了男性和女性学生在经过验证的概念调查和期末考试中的表现之间的相关性，期末考试重点在于定量问题解决。

Prior research suggests that using evidence-based pedagogies can not only improve learning for all students, it can also reduce the gender gap. We describe the impact of physics education research based pedagogical techniques in flipped and active-engagement non-flipped courses on the gender gap observed with validated conceptual surveys. We compare male and female students' performance in courses which make significant use of evidence-based active engagement (EBAE) strategies with courses that primarily use lecture-based (LB) instruction. The analysis presented here includes data from two-semester sequences of introductory algebra-based and calculus-based introductory physics courses. The surveys used to assess student learning in the first and second semester courses were the Force Concept Inventory and the Conceptual Survey of Electricity and Magnetism, respectively. The performance of male and female students in EBAE courses at a particular level is compared with LB courses in two situations: (I) the same instructor taught two courses, one of which was an EBAE course and the other an LB course, while the homework, recitations and final exams were kept the same, (II) student performance in all of the EBAE courses taught by different instructors was averaged and compared with LB courses of the same type also averaged over different instructors. In all cases, we find that students in courses which make significant use of EBAE strategies, on average, outperformed students in courses of the same type using primarily LB instruction even though there was no statistically significant difference on the pretest before instruction. However, the gender gap persisted even in courses using EBAE methods. We also discuss correlations between the performance of male and female students on the validated conceptual surveys and the final exam, which had a heavy weight on quantitative problem solving.