尽管团队在产生创新性和高影响力的科学和技术成果方面的重要性日益增加，但关于团队成员间专业多样性的程度如何影响其产出工作的原创性和影响力仍不清楚。在此，我们开发了一种新方法，基于研究人员的职业历史量化他们的专业知识距离，并将其应用于2300万篇科学论文和400万项专利。我们发现，在科学和技术领域，专业知识多样化的团队往往能产出更具原创性的成果。拥有更多元化专业知识的团队在短期（2年）或中期（5年）并没有显著的优势。然而，它们在长期（10年）表现出更高的影响力，并逐渐吸引更大的跨学科影响力。当其他维度的团队多样性缺失时，这种团队成员间专业知识多样性的影响力溢价尤为明显，因为同一机构或国家内部的团队似乎更倾向于从专业知识多样性中获益。尽管性别多样性团队的平均影响力相对较高，但具有不同性别多样性水平的团队似乎都从增加的专业知识多样性中受益。鉴于当前对个人研究者知识需求的增长、对原创研究激励的需求以及短期和长期影响之间的权衡，这些结果可能对资助、组建和保持具有原创性和持久影响力的研究团队具有重要意义。

Despite the growing importance of teams in producing innovative and high-impact science and technology, it remains unclear how expertise diversity among team members relates to the originality and impact of the work they produce. Here, we develop a new method to quantify the expertise distance of researchers based on their prior career histories and apply it to 23 million scientific publications and 4 million patents. We find that across science and technology, expertise-diverse teams tend to produce work with greater originality. Teams with more diverse expertise have no significant impact advantage in the short- (2 years) or mid-term (5 years). Instead, they exhibit substantially higher long-term impact (10 years), increasingly attracting larger cross-disciplinary influence. This impact premium of expertise diversity among team members becomes especially pronounced when other dimensions of team diversity are missing, as teams within the same institution or country appear to disproportionately reap the benefits of expertise diversity. While gender-diverse teams have relatively higher impact on average, teams with varied levels of gender diversity all seem to benefit from increased expertise diversity. Given the growing knowledge demands on individual researchers, implementation of incentives for original research, and the tradeoffs between short-term and long-term impacts, these results may have implications for funding, assembling, and retaining teams with originality and long-lasting impacts.