摘要 Abstract
年长男性工人在不同职业中的退休行为存在差异,并对政策变化表现出不同的反应,这受到非全职工人相对于全职工人面临的非全职惩罚(即工资下降)的显著影响。许多年长者减少工作时长,在非全职惩罚较高的职业中,他们倾向于更早退休,这一点在日本和美国的数据中得到观察。本研究构建了一个包含职业选择和内生劳动供给的一般均衡模型,强调资产和养老金的存在放大了非全职惩罚对退休决策的影响。研究发现,削减员工的养老金福利会降低日本高非全职惩罚职业的整体劳动力供给,从而降低整个经济的总体福利。相反,增加所得税抵免并免除养老金的收入税可以提升所有职业的劳动力供给,并通过提高实际工资相对于保留工资的比例来增强福利。降低高惩罚职业的非全职惩罚也可以刺激这些高惩罚职业的劳动力供给,并改善长期福利。
Older male workers exhibit diverse retirement behaviors across occupations and respond differently to policy changes, influenced significantly by the part-time penalty, wage reduction faced by part-time workers compared to their full-time counterparts. Many older individuals reduce their working hours, and in occupations with high part-time penalties, they tend to retire earlier, as observed in data from Japan and the United States. This study develops a general equilibrium model that incorporates occupational choices, endogenous labor supply, highlighting that the impact on the retirement decision is amplified by the presence of assets and pensions. I find that cutting employees' pension benefits reduce aggregate labor supply in occupations with high part-time penalties in Japan, reducing overall welfare across the economy. In contrast, increasing income tax credits and exempting pension form income tax boost labor supply across all occupations and enhance welfare by raising disposable wages relative to the reservation wage. Reducing part-time penalties in high-penalty occupations also stimulate the labor supply in high-penalty occupations and improve long-term welfare.